CA P90 vs ECHO 1 P90

Here's where you can discuss everything you have, or want but haven't got...

Moderator: Moderators

Re: CA P90 vs ECHO 1 P90

Postby Dirty_Greek_Phil on Mon Nov 24, 2008 4:28 pm

Metal Body isnt everything, the biggest difference is that does is add weight, now some people like the weight, some people hate it. Personally I like the weightier feel of a metal body, since its closer to real steel. But Metal body wont improve gun performance keep that in mind.
Dirty_Greek_Phil
Recruit
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 5:08 pm

Re: CA P90 vs ECHO 1 P90

Postby ultimentra on Mon Nov 24, 2008 6:13 pm

Well it has more metal in the internals, which does improve performance (at least I think so unless I have been hearing things all this time...) and it has 7mm gearbox and we all no what that means! BALL BEARING BUSHINGS YAY! But anyways I will be doing a review of it over time. This is a learning experience for me right now, and learning takes time and money.
User avatar
ultimentra
TAC XO
 
Posts: 1115
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 10:59 pm

Re: CA P90 vs ECHO 1 P90

Postby blitz on Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:15 pm

its not quality metal tho :shock:
blitz
Private
 
Posts: 57
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 10:32 pm

Re: CA P90 vs ECHO 1 P90

Postby ultimentra on Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:21 pm

Would you rather have not quality metal, or plastic?
User avatar
ultimentra
TAC XO
 
Posts: 1115
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 10:59 pm

Re: CA P90 vs ECHO 1 P90

Postby blitz on Mon Nov 24, 2008 10:15 pm

hahaha yea! a TM! may be plastic but its built like a tank, inside and out.
blitz
Private
 
Posts: 57
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 10:32 pm

Re: CA P90 vs ECHO 1 P90

Postby AZsharpshooter on Mon Nov 24, 2008 10:25 pm

blitz wrote:hahaha yea! a TM! may be plastic but its built like a tank, inside and out.


Agreed
Primary- G&G GR-16 carbine (M4A1)
Back up- Echo 1 G36C
Secondary- KWA G23F

Just call me Sharpshooter
User avatar
AZsharpshooter
Sergeant
 
Posts: 282
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 7:41 am

Re: CA P90 vs ECHO 1 P90

Postby ultimentra on Mon Nov 24, 2008 11:53 pm

I would disagree. TMs may last long stock, but thats because of the low fps. The fps on TMs are literally so low that they can use plastic internals and things. Therefore they last longer because they don't have the rate of fire nor the velocity others do. They may be accurate. However I ask a rhetorical question of you, why bother having excellent accuracy when the target does not even feel/notice the bb hitting them? And even then the amount of shock felt from the impact is so minimal people can brush it off without flinching and its an easy opportunity to not call a hit. Lets face it, all airsoft communities have that problem. But when you hear the guy you just shot got "GAH!" it all but eliminates the need for debate on whether there was not a hit being called or not. I am pretty sure this topic is not about the TM or TM in general though. So lets not keep talking about it unless you want to send me a PM.
User avatar
ultimentra
TAC XO
 
Posts: 1115
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 10:59 pm

Re: CA P90 vs ECHO 1 P90

Postby ben on Tue Nov 25, 2008 10:46 am

fps dosent matter my buddys 4 year old tm m4 shoots 230fps W.2 and i see death rags coming out of the brush all the time when he uses it ;)
ben
TAC Vice President
 
Posts: 403
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2008 3:56 pm

Re: CA P90 vs ECHO 1 P90

Postby ultimentra on Tue Nov 25, 2008 11:23 am

Good for him, im glad hes able to pull that off. But like I said before guys. Getting the E90 here very soon. If I realise oh crap then lesson learned. Its time to take the dive. I get paid on wednesday :twisted:
User avatar
ultimentra
TAC XO
 
Posts: 1115
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 10:59 pm

Re: CA P90 vs ECHO 1 P90

Postby KileyHAZ on Tue Nov 25, 2008 11:46 am

Go with the E90, and make sure to get us a review ;)
"If everyone is thinking alike, someone isn't thinking"
Image
User avatar
KileyHAZ
Executive Advisor
 
Posts: 1551
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2008 11:14 am
Location: Red Rock AZ

PreviousNext

Return to Guns and Gear

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests